fiat 500x price
Base models with a low rate point have existed practically for the reason that dawn of the car age, with the explicit cause of luring shoppers into showrooms, in which smiling salespeople then tempt them into more-pricey models. But one fantastically current development is that during a few automobile families, in case you need a guide transmission your best choice is the base model. Case in point is Fiat’s 500X small crossover.
Within the 500X, this additionally way foregoing all-wheel power, the extra-effective 180-hp 2.Four-liter Tigershark four-cylinder, and several non-compulsory interior capabilities. But, this turns out to be no longer a wholly bad element. In tests of the 500X with the Tigershark/nine-velocity-computerized blend, we emerged with lukewarm feelings towards the transmission, whose consistent looking and penchant for moving into better gears ASAP grow to be wearisome. The manual is mated to Fiat’s 160-hp 1.4-liter MultiAir rapid 4, a mixture that makes for a zero-to-60-mph dash of seven.8 seconds and a quarter-mile run of sixteen.Zero at 87 mph. That’s without a doubt competitive by subcompact-crossover requirements. It’s additionally surprisingly faster than the times we recorded for the 2.Four-liter computerized (eight.7 to 60, sixteen.Eight at 82 within the region-mile). Surprising? Properly, the MultiAir is torquey, with 184 lb-feet arriving at 2500 rpm, however mass might be a larger element. Our front-drive 500X weighed in at 2954 pounds, even as the all-wheel-power Tigershark changed into heavier through 407 kilos.
And, of course, mass additionally impacts gas financial system. The AWD 2.Four-liter 500X is rated through the EPA at 21 mpg town and 30 mpg toll road; the the front-pressure 1.4-liter is higher with the aid of four mpg in each measures. That said, the manual version encourages extra-enthusiastic riding, so our actual-international mileage became a little below expectations: 23 mpg over the course of our take a look at, versus 24 for the Tigershark. Our most effective sadness was braking overall performance. Whilst the brakes themselves are easy to modulate, offer precise pedal experience, and are fade free, the 70-to-0-mph preventing distance is lengthy: 177 feet. Evaluate that to 163 for the Tigershark take a look at automobile, which was the first-rate in our subcompact-crossover evaluation. Tires in all likelihood contributed to this disparity. The Tigershark rolled on 215/60-17 Nexen Classe Premieres, whilst this test example had Continental ProContact TX tires, size 215/60-16.
As stated, opting for a 500X with a guide gearbox takes some of different options off the table. However, the base model (Pop, in Fiat trim-degree parlance) of this little crossover isn’t precisely naked. It’s also pleasing to pressure and it appears slick—a charge tag of simply under $21K makes it look even better.
Within the 500X, this additionally way foregoing all-wheel power, the extra-effective 180-hp 2.Four-liter Tigershark four-cylinder, and several non-compulsory interior capabilities. But, this turns out to be no longer a wholly bad element. In tests of the 500X with the Tigershark/nine-velocity-computerized blend, we emerged with lukewarm feelings towards the transmission, whose consistent looking and penchant for moving into better gears ASAP grow to be wearisome. The manual is mated to Fiat’s 160-hp 1.4-liter MultiAir rapid 4, a mixture that makes for a zero-to-60-mph dash of seven.8 seconds and a quarter-mile run of sixteen.Zero at 87 mph. That’s without a doubt competitive by subcompact-crossover requirements. It’s additionally surprisingly faster than the times we recorded for the 2.Four-liter computerized (eight.7 to 60, sixteen.Eight at 82 within the region-mile). Surprising? Properly, the MultiAir is torquey, with 184 lb-feet arriving at 2500 rpm, however mass might be a larger element. Our front-drive 500X weighed in at 2954 pounds, even as the all-wheel-power Tigershark changed into heavier through 407 kilos.
And, of course, mass additionally impacts gas financial system. The AWD 2.Four-liter 500X is rated through the EPA at 21 mpg town and 30 mpg toll road; the the front-pressure 1.4-liter is higher with the aid of four mpg in each measures. That said, the manual version encourages extra-enthusiastic riding, so our actual-international mileage became a little below expectations: 23 mpg over the course of our take a look at, versus 24 for the Tigershark. Our most effective sadness was braking overall performance. Whilst the brakes themselves are easy to modulate, offer precise pedal experience, and are fade free, the 70-to-0-mph preventing distance is lengthy: 177 feet. Evaluate that to 163 for the Tigershark take a look at automobile, which was the first-rate in our subcompact-crossover evaluation. Tires in all likelihood contributed to this disparity. The Tigershark rolled on 215/60-17 Nexen Classe Premieres, whilst this test example had Continental ProContact TX tires, size 215/60-16.
As stated, opting for a 500X with a guide gearbox takes some of different options off the table. However, the base model (Pop, in Fiat trim-degree parlance) of this little crossover isn’t precisely naked. It’s also pleasing to pressure and it appears slick—a charge tag of simply under $21K makes it look even better.
No comments:
Post a Comment